<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Featured Scene: Full-headed satisfaction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.homoactive.com/featured-scene-full-headed-satisfaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.homoactive.com/featured-scene-full-headed-satisfaction/</link>
	<description>Homoactive Blog provides news, free videos and photo galleries featuring bareback sex and horny twinks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 13:38:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Darkhog (@Darkhog1)		</title>
		<link>https://blog.homoactive.com/featured-scene-full-headed-satisfaction/#comment-3189</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkhog (@Darkhog1)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.homoactive.com/?p=4348#comment-3189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Smoking hot desire!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smoking hot desire!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Motzki		</title>
		<link>https://blog.homoactive.com/featured-scene-full-headed-satisfaction/#comment-3179</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Motzki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.homoactive.com/?p=4348#comment-3179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[´

Well, Stuart, harhsly judged, the plots of 99,998 % of all  gay-, bi- ,  and straight-porn films  released by different companies in the last four decades are  silly and one-dimensional compared with motion picture standards.  

Even  the  flicks of Jean Daniel Cadinot from the eighties &#038; nineties, whom porn critics often praise because of his plots &#038; settings, are somewhat silly. It&#039;s  a question of  budget and production time -  30.000 bucks versus 3 millions; 3 weeks versus 30 months....

Nothing to say against trying to &#039;upvalue&#039; a porn movie by integrating the fucking in a more or less exotic plot. But the main criterias for judging in this genre are still the attractivity of the cast, the duration of the anal action, the quality of the camera work, editing, and sound during the intercourse. 

And in this field even the most luxurious porn productions from the past of Cadinot &#038; Co. show often major flaws (not to talk about heavily overrated companies like Belami, Falcon, Lucas Entertainment, or Channel 1 ;  about disappointing Max Lincoln productions from Eurocreme England ;  about inferior trash from Hammer, Vimpex, eboys, SEVP, Freshwave, Dolphin...)


Amen :)


´]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>´</p>
<p>Well, Stuart, harhsly judged, the plots of 99,998 % of all  gay-, bi- ,  and straight-porn films  released by different companies in the last four decades are  silly and one-dimensional compared with motion picture standards.  </p>
<p>Even  the  flicks of Jean Daniel Cadinot from the eighties &amp; nineties, whom porn critics often praise because of his plots &amp; settings, are somewhat silly. It&#8217;s  a question of  budget and production time &#8211;  30.000 bucks versus 3 millions; 3 weeks versus 30 months&#8230;.</p>
<p>Nothing to say against trying to &#8216;upvalue&#8217; a porn movie by integrating the fucking in a more or less exotic plot. But the main criterias for judging in this genre are still the attractivity of the cast, the duration of the anal action, the quality of the camera work, editing, and sound during the intercourse. </p>
<p>And in this field even the most luxurious porn productions from the past of Cadinot &amp; Co. show often major flaws (not to talk about heavily overrated companies like Belami, Falcon, Lucas Entertainment, or Channel 1 ;  about disappointing Max Lincoln productions from Eurocreme England ;  about inferior trash from Hammer, Vimpex, eboys, SEVP, Freshwave, Dolphin&#8230;)</p>
<p>Amen :)</p>
<p>´</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stuart (@GoldCascade)		</title>
		<link>https://blog.homoactive.com/featured-scene-full-headed-satisfaction/#comment-3177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart (@GoldCascade)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.homoactive.com/?p=4348#comment-3177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But the point I was really trying to get at was that porn &quot;actors&quot; enacting such themes in what are esentially wank fodder is really a bit silly ....as shown by the &quot;fight &quot; between Aaron and Luke ....At least Spyboy took the piss]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the point I was really trying to get at was that porn &#8220;actors&#8221; enacting such themes in what are esentially wank fodder is really a bit silly &#8230;.as shown by the &#8220;fight &#8221; between Aaron and Luke &#8230;.At least Spyboy took the piss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Motzki		</title>
		<link>https://blog.homoactive.com/featured-scene-full-headed-satisfaction/#comment-3174</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Motzki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.homoactive.com/?p=4348#comment-3174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[´

As already written elsewhere in this blog: the above mentioned &#039;Spyboy 1&#039; &#038; &#039;Spyboy 2&#039; , directed &#038; edited  in 2003/4 by Max Lincoln,  feature nice  locations and a pretty cast - but both titles are  foozled by far too many cuts &#038; close-ups, by insensitive camera work, extensive editing  &#038;  bugging music....as nearly every other Eurocreme movie directed &#038; edited by Mr. Lincoln   personally, too.

Because of that  there&#039;s nothing wrong with taking up  the &#039;Secret Service Plot&#039; again.   Since there is no risk and no benchmark spy porn flick out  yet, which could not be easily  overtrumped by a new production....

´]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>´</p>
<p>As already written elsewhere in this blog: the above mentioned &#8216;Spyboy 1&#8217; &amp; &#8216;Spyboy 2&#8217; , directed &amp; edited  in 2003/4 by Max Lincoln,  feature nice  locations and a pretty cast &#8211; but both titles are  foozled by far too many cuts &amp; close-ups, by insensitive camera work, extensive editing  &amp;  bugging music&#8230;.as nearly every other Eurocreme movie directed &amp; edited by Mr. Lincoln   personally, too.</p>
<p>Because of that  there&#8217;s nothing wrong with taking up  the &#8216;Secret Service Plot&#8217; again.   Since there is no risk and no benchmark spy porn flick out  yet, which could not be easily  overtrumped by a new production&#8230;.</p>
<p>´</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stuart (@GoldCascade)		</title>
		<link>https://blog.homoactive.com/featured-scene-full-headed-satisfaction/#comment-3171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart (@GoldCascade)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.homoactive.com/?p=4348#comment-3171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not so sure doing  the &quot;Bond &quot; things cuts it and anyway did Eurocreme not do  this before with Spyboy ..perhaps best to stick to themes that are more realistic for young guys like these .  lol]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so sure doing  the &#8220;Bond &#8221; things cuts it and anyway did Eurocreme not do  this before with Spyboy ..perhaps best to stick to themes that are more realistic for young guys like these .  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
